gcpain
06-25 10:53 AM
I was working with employer -A till 2006 and got I140 approved (Feb 2006) in EB3. In November 2006 I joined employer B as it is good for my carrier. I talk to employer A (body shopper) and he is ready to support for my green card as I worked for him for six long years and still he did not cancel my old H1B.
1. I have two options here my old employer (A) is body-shopper. So he will agree for both future or current employment. I have very good permanent job and bright future prospects with new employer (B). In this case what you guys advice me? Apply I485 as future employment or quit present job and join old employer (A) and apply I485 as current employment?
2. If I do not join old employer (with whom I have I140 approved) now, in this case what are my options for I485 applying? (Only future employment I485/ I can file current employment I485 and not drawing any salary from old employer )
3. Will I485 as future employment has any problems?
4. Can I use AC21 after 180 days on my I485 future employment application?
Appreciate your advice in this matter. Thanks in advance to all your replies and wish you best of luck.
1. I have two options here my old employer (A) is body-shopper. So he will agree for both future or current employment. I have very good permanent job and bright future prospects with new employer (B). In this case what you guys advice me? Apply I485 as future employment or quit present job and join old employer (A) and apply I485 as current employment?
2. If I do not join old employer (with whom I have I140 approved) now, in this case what are my options for I485 applying? (Only future employment I485/ I can file current employment I485 and not drawing any salary from old employer )
3. Will I485 as future employment has any problems?
4. Can I use AC21 after 180 days on my I485 future employment application?
Appreciate your advice in this matter. Thanks in advance to all your replies and wish you best of luck.
wallpaper 2011 The California Gold Rush
dionysus
01-23 02:12 PM
Today, January 23, 2009, USCIS put up new processing times.
NANO3
05-03 09:58 PM
:drool: nice!!
2011 a gold rush in California,
cheesy_x
09-26 01:27 PM
whoah
more...
Can2004
02-27 09:19 PM
Hi there,
This is exactly what my company's attorney had told me. If the new location is within commuting distance/same metropilitan area there is no need for a LCA amendment .
If anybody thinks otherwise please feel free to correct me.
This is exactly what my company's attorney had told me. If the new location is within commuting distance/same metropilitan area there is no need for a LCA amendment .
If anybody thinks otherwise please feel free to correct me.
pappu
11-16 10:23 AM
You can find all information here
http://immigrationvoice.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=72&Itemid=52
We give updates and next action items via state chapters
http://immigrationvoice.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=72&Itemid=52
We give updates and next action items via state chapters
more...
pthoko
07-16 10:17 AM
Anyone has an appointment for H1B stamping at OTTAWA on 25th July? I'm from NJ area, willing to join if anybody's driving...
2010 California Gold Rush,
royus77
06-22 03:44 PM
I'm in same boat, upgraded to PP on June 1. your new status of I140 will be "We received request for PP".
For H1's Ext its the same receipt number . I think for 140 it will be the same .I subscribed to the notification of case status and i received an update oon the case saying the Premium processing requested for the petition
For H1's Ext its the same receipt number . I think for 140 it will be the same .I subscribed to the notification of case status and i received an update oon the case saying the Premium processing requested for the petition
more...
Blog Feeds
07-07 08:10 PM
Immigration Law from Houston Immigration Lawyer - Annie Banerjee Has Just Posted the Following:
The justice Department's suit to block the restrictive law in Arizona is heralded by everyone as an "immigration issue." Both Wall Street Journal and New York Times have huge headings under "Immigration Law." But the question is not about immigration law. It is about the fundamental human right to not be judged by the color of our skin.
The proponents of the bill, like Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce say that the bill "prohibits racial profiling." But I wonder if every individual is stopped and asked for their passports. The will cripple business in the State. Will everyone, ie white, black, brown, yellow, and whatever other color or look need to take their passports, birth certificates, etc to Arizona?
I naturalized into this country and is in the highest tax bracket. I work and pay taxes. Yet I am brown and have an accent. As a practitioner of immigration law, I know say for instance white Canadian who are here, in the US, working illegally, but are white and except for a slight "oot and aboot" has no other accent. Who will the Arizona police "catch"?
The lawsuit is also about separate state and federal rights. The Conservative Supreme Court will champion State rights, but it will remain to be seen whether they champion Separation of Powers. My guess is that their judgment will be clouded by the more emotional issue of immigration.
For more information contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com) or Houston Immigration Attorney (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjeehttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-8318558763551200610?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2010/07/arizona-and-justice-department-on.html)
The justice Department's suit to block the restrictive law in Arizona is heralded by everyone as an "immigration issue." Both Wall Street Journal and New York Times have huge headings under "Immigration Law." But the question is not about immigration law. It is about the fundamental human right to not be judged by the color of our skin.
The proponents of the bill, like Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce say that the bill "prohibits racial profiling." But I wonder if every individual is stopped and asked for their passports. The will cripple business in the State. Will everyone, ie white, black, brown, yellow, and whatever other color or look need to take their passports, birth certificates, etc to Arizona?
I naturalized into this country and is in the highest tax bracket. I work and pay taxes. Yet I am brown and have an accent. As a practitioner of immigration law, I know say for instance white Canadian who are here, in the US, working illegally, but are white and except for a slight "oot and aboot" has no other accent. Who will the Arizona police "catch"?
The lawsuit is also about separate state and federal rights. The Conservative Supreme Court will champion State rights, but it will remain to be seen whether they champion Separation of Powers. My guess is that their judgment will be clouded by the more emotional issue of immigration.
For more information contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com) or Houston Immigration Attorney (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjeehttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-8318558763551200610?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2010/07/arizona-and-justice-department-on.html)
hair ABH California Gold Rush Photo
fcres
01-15 01:59 PM
Sec. 45. 2 Priority date of applicants.
As it sound to me It means PD of primary applicant will be the PD of spouse and child.
I did not follow.
Anyway this is the situation. I'm in EB3 with a PD Dec 2002. DH is in EB2 with a PD in 2006. Can he file I-485 for us using my PD according to the above law?
As it sound to me It means PD of primary applicant will be the PD of spouse and child.
I did not follow.
Anyway this is the situation. I'm in EB3 with a PD Dec 2002. DH is in EB2 with a PD in 2006. Can he file I-485 for us using my PD according to the above law?
more...
ss12345
05-06 01:45 PM
Thanks for doing this service which helps many ppl's lives.
My employer applied for H1 extn last year (sept'08) and after my project ended in Nov'08, I left to home country in Dec'08 (I-94 expired)and I recently came back on H4. I heardfrom my employer that I got an RFE asking client letter and due date was May 4th. He did not respond since I didn't have project. Now I am in the process of project confirmation, and I have to be on H1 to start working again,
1) Do I have to apply for new H1 (non-cap) or just apply for H4 to H1 COS or both? if 'both' then can I apply both in one package under PP? Can I start working on receiving receipt number?
2) Can I apply H1 with the same employer, will there be a problem since he did not respond to RFE before? or can I apply for H1 transfer to a different employer using the previous H1 receipt number(is the receipt number still valid) or apply for new non-cap H1?
My employer applied for H1 extn last year (sept'08) and after my project ended in Nov'08, I left to home country in Dec'08 (I-94 expired)and I recently came back on H4. I heardfrom my employer that I got an RFE asking client letter and due date was May 4th. He did not respond since I didn't have project. Now I am in the process of project confirmation, and I have to be on H1 to start working again,
1) Do I have to apply for new H1 (non-cap) or just apply for H4 to H1 COS or both? if 'both' then can I apply both in one package under PP? Can I start working on receiving receipt number?
2) Can I apply H1 with the same employer, will there be a problem since he did not respond to RFE before? or can I apply for H1 transfer to a different employer using the previous H1 receipt number(is the receipt number still valid) or apply for new non-cap H1?
hot California Gold Rush
Anders �stberg
February 11th, 2004, 10:05 AM
Well, the first thing that I noticed was not the ceiling, but rather the cute little Shetland Sheepdog in the middle of the walkway. Of course, I love dogs (and especially Shelties)... ;)
I think if I stare at the image long enough, I can sometimes see the effect you're talking about, though it's not like that effect jumps out at me. IMHO, this picture is still a good study of geometric forms, whether or not it has issues with optical illusions. :)
Yes, the dog was cute, and kept staring back at me until I took the picture. Unfortunately my mind was set on getting a shot with only a person in the exit at the end of the walkway. As the dog kept looking at me I realized too late that I was blowing a chance at another picture than the one I set out to get. When I finally got is the dog was too far away. :mad:
I think if I stare at the image long enough, I can sometimes see the effect you're talking about, though it's not like that effect jumps out at me. IMHO, this picture is still a good study of geometric forms, whether or not it has issues with optical illusions. :)
Yes, the dog was cute, and kept staring back at me until I took the picture. Unfortunately my mind was set on getting a shot with only a person in the exit at the end of the walkway. As the dog kept looking at me I realized too late that I was blowing a chance at another picture than the one I set out to get. When I finally got is the dog was too far away. :mad:
more...
house California Gold Rush Picture
sweet_jungle
10-14 04:33 AM
This is getting ridiculous...losing my patience
I think a controlled slow movement is good at the beginning of the year. Last year they had made, for example, EB2 India as April 2004 but they had to make it U after 1st quarter.
So, a controlled slow movement will leave to more un-used numbers in the 3rd quarter when they will then be forced to make big jumps in dates to use up annual visa numbers
I think a controlled slow movement is good at the beginning of the year. Last year they had made, for example, EB2 India as April 2004 but they had to make it U after 1st quarter.
So, a controlled slow movement will leave to more un-used numbers in the 3rd quarter when they will then be forced to make big jumps in dates to use up annual visa numbers
tattoo Women in the California Gold
gcnirvana
08-24 12:07 PM
bump
more...
pictures Gold Rush $$$
ComingToUS
05-16 04:16 PM
I'm coming to the US for the first time on H1B. Do I need a one way or a return ticket? My travel agent told me that since I have a multiple entry visa (expiring on Oct 2011) a return ticket is not required unless I need to travel back home within one year. Could someone with knowledge about this issue help me out. I would really appreciate a reply from someone who recently landed in the US on H1B.
Thanks
Thanks
dresses The California gold rush and
saint_2010
07-24 08:33 AM
thats what I did when I moved back to company A. My lawyer suggested as long as company A did not cancel your H1 approval you are good to go!!..Hope this helps. Good luck.
more...
makeup the California gold rush.
Ihitha
02-22 03:44 PM
Hi
I'm currently working on L1B visa from company A. My present employer applied H1B visa also for me and it got approved around in the August last year. Now I'm planning to change my visa status to H1B.
So I would like to know the options that I have to get my visa status changed to H1b.
1) Can I transfer my H1B to some other company now as my H1B already approved? Is it possible?
If it is, how can I change my status?
2) What is the procedure if I have my current employer do my visa status changed to H1B? Do I need to leave US and come back to take that effect?
Please kindly reply to my questions.
Thanks in advance.
I'm currently working on L1B visa from company A. My present employer applied H1B visa also for me and it got approved around in the August last year. Now I'm planning to change my visa status to H1B.
So I would like to know the options that I have to get my visa status changed to H1b.
1) Can I transfer my H1B to some other company now as my H1B already approved? Is it possible?
If it is, how can I change my status?
2) What is the procedure if I have my current employer do my visa status changed to H1B? Do I need to leave US and come back to take that effect?
Please kindly reply to my questions.
Thanks in advance.
girlfriend california gold rush images.
Ruta
07-28 12:15 PM
Please someone tell me whether Ac21 portability 180 days rule applies from the day USCIS receives the application or whether it starts from day you get I-485 Receipt #????
In our case USCIS recieved our application on July 2nd and we have not received receipt # yet. so 180 day clock starts ticking on July 2nd?
In our case USCIS recieved our application on July 2nd and we have not received receipt # yet. so 180 day clock starts ticking on July 2nd?
hairstyles california gold rush images.
sadshaq12
11-18 04:03 PM
Hi Gurus
One question for you
Can A2p the wages be pro rated ?
if monthly wages for an employees is 1000 per month then it should be 12000 per year) company need to prove the ability to pay $12000 per year.
but what if the LC was filed in mid year for example June 2005 and CIS RFE is asking to proof ability to pay (only One year) 2005
can it been showed as June - december = 7 month and onwards
$1000 x7= 7000
is it good approch or no
Thanks
One question for you
Can A2p the wages be pro rated ?
if monthly wages for an employees is 1000 per month then it should be 12000 per year) company need to prove the ability to pay $12000 per year.
but what if the LC was filed in mid year for example June 2005 and CIS RFE is asking to proof ability to pay (only One year) 2005
can it been showed as June - december = 7 month and onwards
$1000 x7= 7000
is it good approch or no
Thanks
naushit
08-07 01:40 PM
Can multiple people together file mandamus?
how about signing a petition and send it to Ombudusman?
In last conference call when some one asked about illogical order of processing
she asked him to file DHS 2007 with her office.
how about about 100+ people filing same DHS 2007? and tell her , illogical processing order is root of many many problems at USCIS.
just my 2 cents....
how about signing a petition and send it to Ombudusman?
In last conference call when some one asked about illogical order of processing
she asked him to file DHS 2007 with her office.
how about about 100+ people filing same DHS 2007? and tell her , illogical processing order is root of many many problems at USCIS.
just my 2 cents....
ArunAntonio
08-22 02:15 PM
Come on guys .. this is easy good stuff ...
Do not hesitate ... you will become a star ....
Do not hesitate ... you will become a star ....
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario